Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of Fredericksburg v. Bopp.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of Fredericksburg v. Bopp Anchor | green | “a party seeking an equitable remedy must do equity and come to court with clean hands.” | 5 |
| 2 | City of Fredericksburg v. Bopp | green | “the doctrine of unclean hands applies to a litigant whose own conduct in connection with the same matter or transaction has been unconscientious, unjust, marked by a want of good faith or violates the principles of equity and righteous dealing.” | 5 |
| 3 | Smith v. Flack | green | “equitable principles are necessarily involved when we consider whether mandamus should issue.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.