Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alabama Power Co. v. Aldridge.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alabama Power Co. v. Aldridge Anchor | green | “a plaintiff must prove a causal connection between the workers' compensation claim and the subsequent discharge in order to establish a prima facie case.” | 5 |
| 2 | Spencer v. Lawson, 1991598 (Ala. 9-14-2001) | green | “materially indistinguishable from the standard by which we review a summary judgment.” | 4 |
| 3 | Culbreth v. Woodham Plumbing Co., Inc. | green | “the plaintiff then has the burden of going forward with rebuttal evidence showing that the defendant's stated reasons” | 3 |
| 4 | Spencer v. Lawson, 1991598 (Ala. 9-14-2001) | green | “indistinguishable from the standard by which we review a summary judgment.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.