Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Birdsboro Municipal Authority v. Reading Co. & Wilmington & Northern Railroad.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Birdsboro Municipal Authority v. Reading Co. & Wilmington & Northern Railroad Anchor | green | “will not reverse a determination of the trial court in a quiet title action absent an error of law or capricious disregard of the evidence.” | 5 |
| 2 | Regions Mortgage, Inc. v. Muthler | green | “whether the findings of fact are supported by competent evidence, whether an error of law has been committed, and whether there has been a manifest abuse of discretion.” | 5 |
| 3 | Regions Mortgage, Inc. v. Muthler | green | “in reviewing an action to quiet title, an appellate court's review is limited to determining whether the findings of fact are supported by competent evidence, whether an error of law has been committed, and whether there has been a manifest abuse of discretion.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.