Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 109 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thomas W. Mallory, Jr. v. David K. Smith, Warden James S. Gilmore, Iii, Attorney General.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thomas W. Mallory, Jr. v. David K. Smith, Warden James S. Gilmore, Iii, Attorney General Anchor | green | “state's chosen procedural scheme” | 33 |
| 2 | Slavek v. Hinkle | green | “that exhaustion of adequate state remedies will 'best serve the policies of federalism.” | 31 |
| 3 | Richard Longworth v. Jon E. Ozmint, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections Henry McMaster Attorney General, State of South Carolina | green | “both the operative facts and the controlling legal principles” | 26 |
| 4 | Richard Longworth v. Jon E. Ozmint, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections Henry McMaster Attorney General, State of South Carolina | green | “fairly present to the state court both the operative facts and the controlling legal principles associated with each claim.” | 19 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.