Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 108 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United States Anchor | green | “may not presume the truthfulness of the complaint's factual allegations.” | 29 |
| 2 | Montoya v. Chao | green | “federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction,” | 28 |
| 3 | David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United States | green | “has wide discretion to allow affidavits, other documents, and a limited evidentiary hearing.” | 27 |
| 4 | The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United States | green | “has wide discretion to allow affidavits, other documents, and a limited evidentiary hearing.” | 24 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.