Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Household Realty Corp. v. Henes, Unpublished Decision (11-1-2007).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Household Realty Corp. v. Henes, Unpublished Decision (11-1-2007) Anchor | green | “this fact cannot be disputed absent evidence to the contrary.” | 5 |
| 2 | Lebron v. A&A Safety, Inc. | green | “if a document does not fall within one of the categories of evidence listed in civ.r. 56(c), it can only be introduced as proper evidentiary material when it is incorporated by reference in a properly framed affidavit pursuant to civ.r. 56(e).” | 3 |
| 3 | Bank One v. Swartz, Unpublished Decision (4-21-2004) | green | “unless controverted by other evidence, a specific averment that an affidavit pertaining to business is made upon personal knowledge of the affiant satisfies the civ.r. 56(e) requirement that affidavits both in support or in opposition to motions for summary judgment show that th…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.