Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mulgrew v. Board of Education.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mulgrew v. Board of Education Anchor | green | “was affected by an error of law” | 8 |
| 2 | Matter of Sell v. New York City Dept. of Educ. | green | “opinions, ideas, or advice exchanged as part of the consultative or deliberative process of government decision making” | 3 |
| 3 | Fappiano v. New York City Police Department | green | “all government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempted from disclosure as provided in the public officers law” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.