Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Eschbach v. Eschbach.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eschbach v. Eschbach Anchor | green | “the court's paramount concern in any custody dispute is to determine, under the totality of the circumstances, what is in the best interests of the child” | 11 |
| 2 | Matter of Wood v. Lozada | green | “the factors to be considered in determining the custody arrangement that is in the child's best interests include the quality of the home environment and the parental guidance the custodial parent provides for the child, the ability of each parent to provide for the child's emot…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.