Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Brown.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Brown Anchor | green | “was not subjected to lengthy, coercive or accusatory questioning” | 6 |
| 2 | People v. Yukl | green | “what a reasonable person, innocent of any crime, would have thought had he or she been in the defendant's position” | 5 |
| 3 | People v. Smielecki | green | “the mere fact that the police may have suspected defendant of having been involved in a murder prior to questioning him at the station does not compel a finding that defendant was in custody” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.