Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 109 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Involuntary Termination.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Involuntary Termination Anchor | green | “need not rule out all possibilities of change; rather, dcs need establish only that there is a reasonable probability that the parent's behavior will not change.” | 30 |
| 2 | In Re Termination of Relationship of DD | green | “parental rights may be terminated when the parents are unable or unwilling to meet their parental responsibilities.” | 27 |
| 3 | In Re Involuntary Termination | green | “only that there is a reasonable probability that the parent's behavior will not change.” | 18 |
| 4 | In Re Involuntary Termination | green | “dcs need not rule out all possibilities of change; rather, it need establish only that there is a reasonable probability that the parent's behavior will not change.” | 10 |
| 5 | In the Matter of the Term. of the Parent-Child Rel. of A.P. & Au.P. M.H. & T.P. v. The Indiana Dept. of Child Services | green | “a parent's historical inability to provide a suitable environment along with the parent's current inability to do the same supports a finding that termination of parental rights is in the best interests of the children.” | 8 |
| 6 | S.E. v. Indiana Department of Child Services | green | “need not wait until a child is irreversibly harmed before terminating the parent-child relationship.” | 8 |
| 7 | A.M. v. Indiana Department of Child Services | green | “a judgment is clearly erroneous if the findings do not support the trial court's conclusions or the conclusions do not support the judgment.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.