Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alliance of Artists & Recording Companies v. General Motors Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alliance of Artists & Recording Companies v. General Motors Co. Anchor | green | “a judgment on the merits . . . by looking at the substance of the pleadings and any judicially noted facts.” | 6 |
| 2 | Lopez v. Nat'l Archives & Records Admin. | green | “comes closer to a summary judgment type of determination.” | 4 |
| 3 | Lopez v. Nat'l Archives & Records Admin. | green | “the law is such that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.