Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Anchor | green | “that serves to bar suit by a plaintiff 'whose unexcused delay, if the suit were allowed, would be prejudicial to the defendant.” | 5 |
| 2 | Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh, as Trustee for the Max-Planck-Institut Fur Kohlenforschung v. Eastman Kodak Company | green | “laches and estoppel are equitable defenses whose appropriateness must be determined in each case under its particular factual situation.” | 4 |
| 3 | Kling v. Hallmark Cards Inc. | green | “because a claim of laches depends on a close evaluation of all the particular facts in a case, it is seldom susceptible of resolution by summary judgment” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.