Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Yale Lock Manufacturing Co. v. Sargent.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yale Lock Manufacturing Co. v. Sargent Anchor | green | “the difference between his pecuniary condition after the infringement, and what his condition would have been if the infringement had not occurred.” | 7 |
| 2 | Coupe v. Royer | green | “compensation for the pecuniary loss he the patentee has suffered from the infringement, without regard to the question whether the defendant has gained or lost by his unlawful acts.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.