Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Luis E. Rodriguez-Abreu v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Luis E. Rodriguez-Abreu v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. Anchor | green | “contracts containing unambiguous language must be construed according to their plain and natural meaning,” | 5 |
| 2 | Sammartano v. Palmas Del Mar Properties, Inc. | green | “a party is not at liberty to articulate specific arguments for the first time on appeal simply because the general issue was before the district court.” | 4 |
| 3 | Luis E. Rodriguez-Abreu v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. | green | “issues of relinquishment of rights and waiver” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.