Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Williams v. New York City Housing Authority.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams v. New York City Housing Authority Anchor | green | “the noose is among the most repugnant of all racist symbols, because it is itself an instrument of violence.” | 4 |
| 2 | Hollins v. Delta Airlines | green | “several hangman's nooses dangling from the ceiling above the plaintiffs work area” | 3 |
| 3 | Williams v. New York City Housing Authority | green | “indeed, the noose is among the most repugnant of all racist symbols, because it is itself an instrument of violence.” | 3 |
| 4 | Johnson v. Potter | green | “deeply a part of this country's collective consciousness and history, any further explanation of how one could infer a racial motive appears quite unnecessary.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.