Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Merrel J. Cline v. Morris L. Brusett.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Merrel J. Cline v. Morris L. Brusett Anchor | green | “does not constitute a deprivation of life, liberty or property without due process of law and, therefore, is not cognizable” | 5 |
| 2 | Lassiter v. City of Bremerton | green | “for the purpose of denying the plaintiff equal protection or another specific constitutional right.” | 5 |
| 3 | Lone Star Security & Video, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles | green | “narrowly tailored to serve a significant governmental interest and leave open ample alternative channels for communication of the information.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.