Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 107 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Raspardo v. Carlone.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raspardo v. Carlone Anchor | green | “this standard has both objective and subjective components: the conduct complained of must be severe or pervasive enough that a reasonable person would find it hostile or abusive, and the victim must subjectively perceive the work environment to be abusive.” | 29 |
| 2 | Alfano v. Costello | green | “as a general rule, incidents must be more than episodic; they must be sufficiently continuous and concerted in order to be deemed pervasive.” | 28 |
| 3 | Alfano v. Costello | green | “as a general rule, incidents must be more than 'episodic; they must be sufficiently continuous and concerted in order to be deemed pervasive.” | 25 |
| 4 | Alfano v. Costello | green | “isolated acts, unless very serious, do not meet the threshold of severity or pervasiveness.” | 25 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.