Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Calisto, Samuel J..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Calisto, Samuel J. Anchor | green | “was occasioned not by a scheme to deceive the magistrate about a material fact, but by a desire to withhold a fact not material to the magistrate's task.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. David Loren Frost | green | “whether the affidavit would have provided probable cause if it had contained a disclosure of the omitted information.” | 3 |
| 3 | Mary Velardi and Frances Velardi v. Cornelius R. Walsh, Jr. And Robert L. Boek | green | “large quantities of alleged methamphetamine from his residence” | 3 |
| 4 | United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit | green | “a violation of a constitutional right at all.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.