Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 106 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Martinez v. Beggs.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Martinez v. Beggs Anchor | green | “when a defendant asserts qualified immunity at summary judgment, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show that: (1) the defendant violated a constitutional right and (2) the constitutional right was clearly established.” | 26 |
| 2 | Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc. | green | “that there is an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving party's case.” | 20 |
| 3 | prod.liab.rep.(cch)p. 13,792 Patrick Thrasher v. B & B Chemical Company, Inc., a Florida Corporation | green | “there is no genuine dispute over a material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 18 |
| 4 | Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc. | green | “showing that there is an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving party's case.” | 17 |
| 5 | Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc. | green | “there is an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving party's case.” | 16 |
| 6 | Penry v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka | green | “where the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.