Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 106 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rodriguez-Reyes v. Molina-Rodriguez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rodriguez-Reyes v. Molina-Rodriguez Anchor | green | “accept as true all well-pleaded facts alleged in the complaint and draw all reasonable inferences therefrom in the pleader's favor.” | 27 |
| 2 | Grajales v. Puerto Rico Ports Authority | green | “must contain sufficient factual matter to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” | 25 |
| 3 | Santiago v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico | green | “must contain sufficient factual matter to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” | 18 |
| 4 | McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc. | green | “to establish a pattern of racketeering, a plaintiff must show at least two predicate acts of 'racketeering activity', as the statute defines such activity, and must establish that the 'predicates are related, and that they amount to or pose a threat of continued criminal activit…” | 10 |
| 5 | United States v. Leoner-Aguirre | green | “prove that the defendant or his co-conspirators committed any overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.” | 10 |
| 6 | Menard v. CSX Transportation, Inc. | green | “at least where . . . 'some of the information needed may be in the control of the defendants.” | 8 |
| 7 | Menard v. CSX Transportation, Inc. | green | “where a plausible claim may be indicated 'based on what is known,' at least where . . . 'some of the information needed may be in the control of the defendants.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.