Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Presley.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Presley Anchor | green | “properly calculate the guidelines range, treat the guidelines as advisory, consider the 3553(a) factors and adequately explain the chosen sentence-including an explanation for any variance from the guidelines range.” | 6 |
| 2 | United States v. Josh Small | green | “the substantive reasonableness inquiry determines if the length of a sentence conforms with the sentencing goals set forth in 18 u.s.c. 3553 (a).” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Josh Small | green | “an unreasonable amount of weight to any pertinent factor.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.