Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 106 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Allen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Allen Anchor | green | “sufficient material facts that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief.” | 33 |
| 2 | State v. Smith | green | “a court need not address both components of this inquiry if the defendant does not make a sufficient showing on one.” | 30 |
| 3 | State v. Allen | green | “must prevail on both parts of the test to be afforded relief.” | 22 |
| 4 | State v. Roberson | green | “the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been established and whether it led to prejudice rising to a level undermining the reliability of the proceeding.” | 14 |
| 5 | State v. Bentley | green | “has examined the relevant facts, applied the proper legal standards, and engaged in a rational decision-making process.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.