Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re: Pamela Knapper, F/k/a Pamela Jones, Pamela Knapper William C. Miller v. Bankers Trust Co., as Trustee for Amresco Residential Securities Corp.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re: Pamela Knapper, F/k/a Pamela Jones, Pamela Knapper William C. Miller v. Bankers Trust Co., as Trustee for Amresco Residential Securities Corp Anchor | green | “if the federal claim is inextricably intertwined with the state adjudication, meaning that federal relief can only be predicated upon a conviction that the state court was wrong.” | 7 |
| 2 | Thomas Gage v. Wells Fargo Bank NA | green | “must be met for the doctrine to apply.” | 3 |
| 3 | Philadelphia Entertainment & Development Partners, LP v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Revenue | green | “federal courts had been applying the rooker-feldman doctrine too broadly and consequently it clarified that the doctrine is confined to 'limited circumstances' where 'state-court losers complain of injuries caused by state-court judgments rendered before the district court proce…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.