Topic: in each case, the trial court must consider the entire comp… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #29515

4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Eubanks.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 People v. Eubanks Anchor
cal · 1996
green “in each case, the trial court must consider the entire complex of facts surrounding the conflict to determine whether the conflict makes fair and impartial treatment of the defendant unlikely.” 4
2 Murgia v. Municipal Court
cal · 1975
green “a criminal defendant may object . . . to the maintenance of the prosecution on the ground of deliberate invidious discrimination in the enforcement of the law” 3
3 Millsap v. Superior Court
calctapp · 1999
green “the trial judge who had presided over the case, and who was familiar with the parties and their counsel, found no basis for recusal” 3
4 People v. Griffin
cal · 2004
green “sets forth the procedure for a defendant to seek an order . . . recusing a member of the district attorney's office, or the office as a whole, for a conflict of interest.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check