Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 106 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Odom.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Odom Anchor | green | “fundamental error, something so basic, so prejudicial, so lacking in its elements that justice cannot have been done,” | 58 |
| 2 | State v. Gobal | green | “statements elicited by a defendant on cross-examination are, even if error, invited error, by which a defendant cannot be prejudiced as a matter of law.” | 12 |
| 3 | State v. Barber | green | “a defendant who invites error has waived his right to all appellate review concerning the invited error, including plain error review.” | 11 |
| 4 | State v. Barber | green | “thus, a defendant who invites error has waived his right to all appellate review concerning the invited error, including plain error review.” | 9 |
| 5 | State v. Blackstock | green | “whether the judge's comments, questions or actions constitute reversible error is a question to be considered in light of the factors and circumstances disclosed by the record, the burden of showing prejudice being upon the defendant.” | 8 |
| 6 | State v. Harding | green | “failed to object, actively participated in crafting the challenged instruction, and affirmed it was 'fine.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.