Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Clarke v. Oregon Health Sciences University.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clarke v. Oregon Health Sciences University Anchor | green | “incapable of restoring the right that has been injured.” | 4 |
| 2 | Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc. | red | “incapable of restoring the right that has been injured.” | 3 |
| 3 | Greist v. Phillips | green | “wholly denies a remedy for legitimate losses that exceed 500,000.” | 3 |
| 4 | Hale v. Port of Portland | green | “the remedy need not be precisely of the same type or extent; it is enough that the remedy is a substantial one.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.