Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gruebele v. Geringer.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gruebele v. Geringer Anchor | green | “to satisfy the elements for adverse possession, the acts on which the claimant relies must be actual, visible, continuous, notorious, distinct, and hostile, and of such character to unmistakably indicate an assertion of claim of exclusive ownership by the occupant.” | 4 |
| 2 | Moody v. Sundley | green | “actual knowledge of the adverse possession is not necessary if there is a course of conduct directly hostile and these acts of hostility are 'unmistakably clear.” | 3 |
| 3 | Gimbel v. Magrum | green | “the doctrine of acquiescence applies when parties mutually mistake a boundary as a property line.” | 3 |
| 4 | State Finance Co. v. Beck | green | “such harmless trespasses are committed upon the well-founded assumption that ordinarily a neighbor will acquiesce in and consent to them” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.