Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Williams v. Khalaf.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams v. Khalaf Anchor | green | “in order to adjudicate justly, fairly and equitably the rights of the litigants.” | 5 |
| 2 | Williams v. Khalaf | green | “it is our practice to construe points of error liberally in order to adjudicate justly, fairly and equitably the rights of the litigants.” | 4 |
| 3 | Anderson v. Gilbert | green | “a substantial compliance with these briefing rules will suffice in the interest of justice.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.