Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Perez v. TRAVELERS EX REL. AMES.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Perez v. TRAVELERS EX REL. AMES Anchor | green | “for purposes of an award of attorney's fees under vermont law, the touchstone is reasonableness.” | 6 |
| 2 | L'ESPERANCE v. Benware | green | “the novelty of the legal issue, the experience of the attorney, and the results obtained in the litigation.” | 5 |
| 3 | Soon Kwon v. Eaton | green | “is not whether the attorney's fee award is proportional to the damages, but rather whether the fee award is reasonable given the demands of the case.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.