Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Chia-Lee Hsu v. Abbara.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chia-Lee Hsu v. Abbara Anchor | green | “in determining litigation success, courts should respect substance rather than form, and to this extent should be guided by 'equitable considerations.” | 9 |
| 2 | Scott Co. of California v. Blount, Inc. | green | “when a party obtains a simple, unqualified victory by completely prevailing on or defeating all contract claims in the action and the contract contains a provision for attorney fees, civil code section 1717 entitles the successful party to recover reasonable attorney fees incurr…” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.