Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McBride v. Clayton.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McBride v. Clayton Anchor | green | “all statutes are presumed to be enacted by the legislature with full knowledge of the existing condition of the law and with reference to it.” | 4 |
| 2 | Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Public Utility Commission | green | “to produce the extrajudicial facts they claim played a role in the commission's final decision” | 3 |
| 3 | Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Public Utility Commission | green | “failure to produce the extrajudicial facts they claim played a role in the commission's final decision” | 3 |
| 4 | Hammack v. Public Utility Com'n of Texas | green | “appellants bore the burden of proof to establish by evidence the procedural irregularities they allege” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.