Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Coleman v. Commonwealth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coleman v. Commonwealth Anchor | green | “circumstantial evidence is as competent and is entitled to as much weight as direct evidence, provided the evidence as a whole is sufficiently convincing to exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that of guilt.” | 6 |
| 2 | Hughes v. Commonwealth | green | “consider otherwise innocent circumstances in isolation and conclude that each circumstance standing alone” | 4 |
| 3 | Johnson v. Commonwealth | green | “done in furtherance of his sexual advances and not with the intent to deprive the victim of her personal liberty.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.