Topic: the consumer expectation test assesses 'whether the product… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #29751

4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lea Ann Tatham v. Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Lea Ann Tatham v. Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc. Anchor
tenn · 2015
green “the consumer expectation test assesses 'whether the product's condition poses a danger beyond that expected by an ordinary consumer with reasonable knowledge.” 4
2 Jackson v. General Motors Corp.
tenn · 2001
green “a seat belt is a familiar product whose basic function is well understood by the general population” 3
3 Maness v. Boston Scientific
tned · 2010
green “by definition, buyer oriented.” 3
4 King Bradley, Jr. v. Ameristep, Inc.
ca6 · 2015
green “employ its own sense of whether the product meets ordinary expectations,” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check