Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sarni v. Meloccaro.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sarni v. Meloccaro Anchor | green | “looked to substance not labels.” | 6 |
| 2 | Casa DiMario, Inc. v. Richardson | green | “is addressed to the trial justice's sound judicial discretion and his or her ruling will not be disturbed on appeal absent a showing of an abuse of discretion or an error of law.” | 4 |
| 3 | Bendix Corp. v. Norberg | green | “vests the superior court with broad power to vacate judgments whenever that action is appropriate to accomplish justice but that the circumstances must be extraordinary to justify relief.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.