Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Garcia v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Garcia v. State Anchor | green | “once evidence is received without a proper limiting instruction, it becomes part of the general evidence in the case and may be used as proof to the full extent of its rational persuasive power.” | 4 |
| 2 | Roberts v. Healey | green | “an efficient, exciting, or contributing cause, which in a natural sequence, produced injuries or damages complained of, if any.” | 3 |
| 3 | McGee v. Smith | green | “unless the form or mode of treatment is a matter of common knowledge, or the matter is within the experience of a layperson.” | 3 |
| 4 | Read v. Scott Fetzer Co. | green | “act or omission was a substantial factor in bringing about injury' without which the harm would not have occurred.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.