Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Star Enterprise v. Marze.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Star Enterprise v. Marze Anchor | green | “the evidence which supports the finding is so weak as to make the finding clearly wrong and manifestly unjust.” | 9 |
| 2 | Bennett v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline | green | “if we determine that the evidence is factually insufficient, we must detail the evidence relevant to the issue and state in what regard the contrary evidence greatly outweighs the evidence in support of the challenged finding; we need not do so when we affirm.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.