Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Black v. City of Killeen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Black v. City of Killeen Anchor | green | “adopted in 1912, the home rule amendment 'altered the longstanding practice of having special charters individually granted and amended by the legislature' for the state's larger cities.” | 5 |
| 2 | McGraw v. Teichman | green | “the result of the home rule amendment is that now it is necessary to look to the acts of the legislature not for grants of power to such cities but only for limitations on their powers.” | 5 |
| 3 | Forwood v. City of Taylor | green | “the result of the home rule amendment is that now it is necessary to look to the acts of the legislature not for grants of power to such cities but only for limitations on their powers.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.