Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Williams.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Williams Anchor | green | “application of a statute is a question of law that compels plenary review to determine whether the court committed an error of law.” | 6 |
| 2 | Devine v. Hutt | green | “whether the statute of limitations has run on a claim is generally a question of law for the trial judge.” | 5 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Williams | green | “a question of law that compels plenary review to determine whether the court committed an error of law.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.