Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dexheimer v. Industrial Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dexheimer v. Industrial Commission Anchor | green | “it is the province of the commission to weigh and resolve conflicts in testimony, including medical testimony, and to choose among conflicting inferences therefrom. it is only when the decision of the commission is without substantial foundation in the evidence or its finding is…” | 6 |
| 2 | Martin v. Industrial Commission | green | “the manifest weight of the evidence is that which is” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.