Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cullinan v. Fehrenbacher.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cullinan v. Fehrenbacher Anchor | green | “acted arbitrarily without the employment of conscientious judgment or, in view of all the circumstances, exceeded the bounds of reason and ignored recognized principles of law so that substantial prejudice resulted.” | 4 |
| 2 | TIG Insurance v. Canel | green | “ultimate fact upon which recovery is predicated in the underlying action.” | 3 |
| 3 | Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. Pittington | green | “underlying tort suit is based solely on theories of negligence.” | 3 |
| 4 | USAA Casualty Insurance Company v. McInerney | green | “the cyrs properly alleged an alternative theory of recovery and there is no indication that the claim for negligent misrepresentation was a transparent attempt to trigger insurance coverage” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.