Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re County Treasurer.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re County Treasurer Anchor | green | “the failure to inform the court of any facts that might change the court's ruling can amount to fraud for purposes of vacating tax deeds.” | 5 |
| 2 | In Re Application of County Treasurer | green | “a wrongful intent-an act calculated to deceive.” | 5 |
| 3 | In Re County Treasurer | green | “due process concerns demand a special interpretation of the fraud requirement of section 22-45(3).” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.