Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People Ex Rel. Madigan v. Snyder.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People Ex Rel. Madigan v. Snyder Anchor | green | “mandamus is an extraordinary remedy traditionally used to compel a public official to perform a ministerial duty.” | 9 |
| 2 | Hadley v. Montes | green | “only if a plaintiff establishes a clear, affirmative right to relief, a clear duty of the public official to act, and a clear authority in the public official to comply with the writ.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.