Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Laabs v. City of Victorville.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Laabs v. City of Victorville Anchor | green | “we review the record and the determination of the trial court de novo.” | 7 |
| 2 | Kahn v. East Side Union High School District | green | “a defendant's motion for summary judgment should be granted if no triable issue exists as to any material fact and the defendant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. the burden of persuasion remains with the party moving for summary judgment.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.