Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Albano v. Shea Homes Ltd. Partnership.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Albano v. Shea Homes Ltd. Partnership Anchor | green | “in determining the law of the state for purposes of diversity, a federal court is bound by the decisions of the highest state court.” | 5 |
| 2 | Jauregui v. Mid-Century Insurance | green | “where no dispute surrounds material facts, interpretation of an insurance policy presents solely a question of law.” | 4 |
| 3 | Haynes v. Farmers Insurance Exchange | green | “any provision that takes away or limits coverage reasonably expected by an insured must be conspicuous, plain and clear.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.