Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 104 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v Sours.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v Sours Anchor | green | “ov 19 is generally scored for conduct that constitutes an attempt to avoid being caught and held accountable for the sentencing offense.” | 44 |
| 2 | People v. Hershey | green | “the plain and ordinary meaning of 'interfere with the administration of justice' for purposes of ov 19 is to oppose so as to hamper, hinder, or obstruct the act or process of administering judgment of individuals or causes by judicial process.” | 35 |
| 3 | People v. Hershey | green | “to oppose so as to hamper, hinder, or obstruct the act or process of administering judgment of individuals or causes by judicial process.” | 13 |
| 4 | People v. Hershey | green | “opposing so as to hamper, hinder, or obstruct the act or process of administering judgment of individuals or causes by judicial process.” | 12 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.