Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Dolgencorp, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Dolgencorp, LLC Anchor | green | “where that court has not spoken, however, we must predict how the highest court would decide this case.” | 5 |
| 2 | James L. Turner v. Theodore v. Wells, Jr. | green | “in making this prediction, 'we are bound to adhere to the decisions of the state's intermediate appellate courts absent some persuasive indication that the state's highest court would decide the issue otherwise.” | 5 |
| 3 | SE Property Holdings, LLC v. Neverve LLC | green | “because we are interpreting florida law, we look first for case precedent from florida's highest court-the florida supreme court.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.