Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 103 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Baker v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baker v. State Anchor | green | “in essence, we assess only whether the verdict could be reached based on reasonable inferences that may be drawn from the evidence presented.” | 73 |
| 2 | Jordan v. State | green | “the resolution of which is within the province of the trier of fact.” | 14 |
| 3 | Charles Moore v. State of Indiana | green | “where a sole witness presents inherently contradictory testimony which is equivocal or the result of coercion and there is a complete lack of circumstantial evidence of the appellant's guilt.” | 13 |
| 4 | Stewart v. State | green | “on appeal, the circumstantial evidence need not overcome every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.