Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Cruz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Cruz Anchor | neutral | “defendant has not demonstrated 'the absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations for defense counsel's' stipulation” | 4 |
| 2 | People v. De Stefano | green | “even in the absence of direct proof that he actually received notice of the trial date” | 3 |
| 3 | Town of Somerset v. Perry | neutral | “the crime of bail jumping does not require proof of any culpable mental state” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Russin | green | “facts . . . developed in connection with defendant's renewed motion to vacate the conviction pursuant to cpl 440.10, but defendant did not obtain permission to appeal from the order denying that motion” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.