Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities Anchor | green | “unless there is evidence to the contrary, statutory itemization indicates that the legislature intended the list to be exclusive.” | 8 |
| 2 | Dwyer v. Farrell | green | “to continue to hold a gun permit, the law requires that there be facts sufficient to show generally that he or she lacks” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.