Topic: purely speculative or conclusory assertions of the conseque… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #30443

4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alamo, Tony v. Clay, Jasper R..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Alamo, Tony v. Clay, Jasper R. Anchor
cadc · 1998
green “purely speculative or conclusory assertions of the consequences of the alleged stigma and accordingly do not satisfy the supreme court's requirement for specific, concrete facts demonstrating a particularized injury.” 3
2 Young America's Foundation v. Gates
cadc · 2009
green “(1) injury in fact, (2) causation, and (3) redressability,” 3
3 Port Washington Teachers' Association v. Board Of Education Of The Port Washington Union Free School District
ca2 · 2007
green “because the plaintiffs have not established that civil liability or professional discipline is actual or imminent, the theoretical possibility that either might occur does not amount to injury in fact.” 3
4 Baptist Memorial Hospital v. Johnson
dcd · 2009
green “would not 'be beneficial to the plaintiff's establishment of jurisdiction,' and therefore, discovery need not be granted prior to dismissal on jurisdictional grounds.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check